Bibliographic Description |
|
Study No.: |
4283 |
|---|---|
Title: |
National Center for Early Development and Learning Multistate Study of Pre-Kindergarten, 2001-2003 |
Principal Investigator(s): |
Clifford, Dick, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Frank P. Graham Child Development Institute Bryant, Donna, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Frank P. Graham Child Development Institute Burchinal, Margaret, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Frank P. Graham Child Development Institute Barbarin, Oscar, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Frank P. Graham Child Development Institute Early, Diane, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Frank P. Graham Child Development Institute Howes, Carollee, University of California-Los Angeles. Graduate School of Education and Information Studies Pianta, Robert, University of Virginia. Curry School of Education Winton, Pam, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Frank P. Graham Child Development Institute |
Funding: |
United States Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences |
Bibliographic Citation: |
Clifford, Dick, Donna Bryant, Margaret Burchinal, Oscar Barbarin, Diane Early, Carollee Howes, Robert Pianta, and Pam Winton. National Center for Early Development and Learning Multistate Study of Pre-Kindergarten, 2001-2003. ICPSR04283-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2009-06-08. doi:10.3886/ICPSR04283.v2 |
Scope of Study |
|
Summary: |
The National Center for Early Development and Learning (NCEDL) Multi-State Study of Pre-Kindergarten examined the pre-kindergarten programs of six states: California, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Kentucky, and Georgia. For this study, pre-kindergarten (pre-k) included center-based programs for four-year-olds that are fully or partially funded by state education agencies and that are operated in schools or under the direction of state and local education agencies. The study had two primary purposes:
The study addressed six primary groups of research questions:
The six states in the study were selected based on the significant amount of resources they have committed to pre-k initiatives. States were also selected to maximize the diversity in geography, program settings (public school or community), program intensity (full day versus part day), and educational requirements for teachers. Within each state, a random sample of 40 centers/schools was selected. One classroom in each center/school was selected at random for observation, and four children in each classroom were selected for individual assessment. The children were followed from the beginning of pre-k through the end of kindergarten. In five of the six states, families were also visited in their homes.
Demographic information collected includes race, gender, family income, and mother's education level. The above information pertains to the Main Child Level Public-Use Version and the Main Child Level Restricted-Use Version. From these main datasets, subsets were created at the classroom level for Pre-Kindergarten (Pre-K Classroom Level Public-Use Version and Pre-K Classroom Level Restricted-Use Version) and for Kindergarten (Kindergarten Classroom Level Public-Use Version and Kindergarten Classroom Level Restricted-Use Version). |
Subject Terms: |
academic achievement, classroom environment, early childhood education, educational policy, educational programs, educationally disadvantaged, funding, government regulation, literacy education, mathematics, outcome evaluation, poverty, prediction, teacher education, teacher qualifications, teacher salaries, teacher student relationship, teaching conditions |
Smallest Geographic Unit: |
state |
Geographic Coverage: |
Albany (New York), California, Central Valley (California), Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Los Angeles, New York (state), New York City, Ohio, United States |
Time Period: |
|
Date of Collection: |
|
Unit of Observation: |
individual (child), classroom |
Universe: |
Children old enough for kindergarten in fall 2002, who did not have an Individualized Education Plan, who spoke competent English or Spanish, and who were enrolled in center-based programs for four-year-olds that were fully or partially funded by state education agencies and that were operated in schools or under the direction of state and local education agencies within six selected states: California, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Kentucky, and Georgia. |
Data Types: |
observational data, survey data |
Data Collection Notes: |
Additional information about this study is available on the Web site of the National Center for Early Development and Learning. The variable CHHLPROBTK contains values that were entered verbatim from written responses provided by the survey respondents. The original data file received from the data depositor also contained truncated values for this variable. The information to correct this truncation could not be provided and so the variable was left unedited. The variables CHPARTCDK_A through CHPARTCDK_I are nine variables which record whether or not each data collection segment has data for a particular child. These nine variables were created from a single variable which was originally an amalgam of all the data found within each of the nine variables. This original variable proved difficult to process and less simple to manipulate. |
Methodology |
|
Sample: |
The pool of potential sites was limited to 19 states that served 15 percent or 15,000 four-year-olds. That pool was reduced to six states chosen to represent diversity in length of program day, teacher credentialing requirements, program locales (in schools versus in community settings), and geography. After state selection, 20 ZIP codes from each state/region were randomly chosen, two sites were randomly chosen from each of those, one pre-k classroom was randomly selected from each selected site, and four pre-k children were randomly selected from each of those classrooms. Program sites in California were limited to 20 in the greater Los Angeles area and 20 in the Central Valley area, while selection sites in New York were similarly limited to 20 in New York City and 20 within a 50-mile radius of Albany. |
Weight: |
(1) All analysis should include the state variable when weights are used. The samples were drawn separately for each state and the weights add to 100 percent within each state, not across each state. (2) For children within a classroom, because boys and girls were sampled and the dispersions were sometimes low, they were considered sampled without replacement, by gender. (3) The child weights were adjusted for nonresponse using a model-based approach. Children were divided based upon important demographic characteristics and then proportionally reweighted within each cell that contained attrition. (4) The weights should be used any time that a cross-sectional analysis within a period is performed. For example, the effect on children's test scores in the spring of pre-k based upon classroom and teacher characteristics should use the spring of pre-k child weights. |
Mode of Data Collection: |
computer-assisted self interview (CASI), coded on-site observation, coded video observation, cognitive assessment test, face-to-face interview, self-enumerated questionnaire |
Response Rates: |
Of the 40 sites per state, 78 percent of eligible sites agreed to participate (fall of pre-k, n = 238). For fall of pre-k (n = 238), 94 percent of the one classroom per site selected agreed to participate. For fall of pre-k (n = 940), 61 percent of the parents of eligible children consented. |
Extent of Processing: |
All archived data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. The archive also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, the archive performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
|
Access and Availability |
|
Note: |
Detailed file-level information (such as record length, case count, and variable count) is listed in the file manifest. |
Original ICPSR Release: |
2005-10-26 |
Restrictions: |
Users are reminded that these data are to be used solely for statistical reporting and analysis, and not for the investigation of specific individuals or states. The reporting of state-level statistics of any type is prohibited. To protect respondent privacy, the public-use and restricted-use versions of the data differ in the amount of geographic detail provided. The restricted-use version contains the variables: SITE and SPSU while the public-use version does not. Access to parts of this study requires a signed User Agreement. To obtain the file(s), researchers must agree to the terms and conditions of the Restricted Data Use Agreement, which is included with every download and can also be obtained separately on the Browse Documentation page. |
Version History: |
|
Dataset(s): |
|